top of page

Hunger VS Appetite -- My Philosophy On It

Updated: 6 days ago

A group of people dinning in a room

Hunger VS Appetite -- My Philosophy On It


Hunger and appetite are two concepts that are often confused, not just in relation to food but in many aspects of life. When people advocate for the end of hunger, they may not fully grasp that hunger itself is merely an indication of an unmet necessity, a biological signal that something is required for survival.


Appetite, on the other hand, is not about survival but desire. It is like an invisible hand pulling one toward indulgence, amplifying cravings, and fostering attachment to things that are often unnecessary. The hungrier you are, the closer you stand to physical deterioration. Yet, the stronger your appetite, the deeper your suffering may become—not from a lack of need, but from an overabundance of wants.





There is also a third element that binds hunger and appetite together—demand. The economy thrives on demand, regardless of whether the object of demand is essential or trivial. Some things and relationships are fundamental to existence, while others are constructs of desire, artificially inflating the illusion of necessity.


We all understand what hunger is: the state of physical depletion, a reminder that nourishment is required for survival. Without this instinctual prompt, humanity would lack the natural incentive to sustain itself. Appetite, however, is not a requirement—it is a luxury that masquerades as need. It can enslave people, turning them into consumers trapped in cycles of indulgence.


To illustrate: hedonic toxins, alcohol, sexual attraction, and other addictive pursuits are often framed as things we "need" to feel whole. Yet in truth, these things manipulate us, making us dependent on those who supply them.


The more one is governed by appetite, the more susceptible they become to exploitation. A world built on appetite is one where people are led not by necessity but by marketed desires, forming a population that feeds industries designed to profit off human cravings.


But how does appetite create suffering? Consider depriving yourself of the things you don’t truly need—television, sugary foods, social media, or your smartphone. Notice the internal struggle. This struggle is not rooted in hunger, but in psychological distress. It is an exposure to the reality of dependency, the realization that much of what brings you comfort is an escape, a diversion from an inner void.


The Illusion of Passion and the Weakening of the Individual


Passions can be sources of happiness, yet they are also distractions. They remove one from reality, allowing one to live in a constructed world where joy is dictated by access to external stimuli.


Imagine someone who enjoys eating meat or drinking alcohol. When these items become unavailable, they do not perish as they would from starvation; rather, they suffer mentally, realizing how much of their perceived satisfaction was conditional upon external factors.


This is a fundamental, yet widely overlooked, distinction between hunger and appetite. Hunger is an unavoidable truth of existence, a biological imperative. Appetite, however, is the illusion of demand, a self-imposed dependency that fosters weakness. The modern world conditions individuals to chase convenience and comfort, but in doing so, it strips away their resilience.


Consider children with an insatiable craving for sugary products. Sugar, while necessary in moderation, is a substance with addictive properties. The more one consumes, the more one desires. A heightened appetite for sugar is not a sign of sustenance but of growing dependency, of an individual becoming weaker in the face of their own cravings.





Appetite as a Gateway to Addiction


What is the difference between appetite and addiction? Appetite can be seen as an early stage of addiction—a precursor. A craving is merely a temptation, yet, given time and repetition, it can evolve into addiction. Addiction manifests in habitual patterns, and appetite sustains these patterns indefinitely, forming cycles of dependency that can consume a lifetime.


To better understand this, I have personally experimented with various addictive behaviors—not because I sought to be controlled by them, but to analyze their effects. I drank beer regularly, indulged in fast food, and played video games throughout the night.


Yet despite these experiences, I found myself largely immune to developing an overwhelming appetite for them.


This realization led me to a sobering conclusion: much of what life offers is empty indulgence. Many of the pursuits people devote themselves to are not passions but distractions. They serve as barriers, shielding individuals from confronting the ultimate solitude—the self.


The Fear of Solitude and the Addiction to Noise


There is a reason solitary confinement is regarded as a form of psychological torment. Modern humans, conditioned by an abundance of external stimulations, have lost their ability to endure stillness. Can you imagine existing without the internet for the rest of your life? Past generations lived without it, yet today, many cannot fathom such an existence.


I once thought addiction was limited to substances like tobacco and alcohol. Now, I see it differently. Modern addiction is more insidious—it is electricity, it is connectivity, it is the ever-present digital world that people cannot detach from. Essentially, electricity has become the ultimate drug of contemporary society.


I must confess—I have an addiction of my own. While I am resistant to coffee or gaming, I am deeply uncomfortable with silence. The stillness unnerves me, and so I fill my world with music. Even as I drift to sleep, I surround myself with sound, not because I need it, but because I want it. It is my personal refuge from an environment that has long been harsh on my senses.


What about you? Whether it is smoking, drinking, or compulsively scrolling through the internet—what is your justification? What makes you, theoretically, a weaker individual? We all have something, an indulgence we cling to.



Is your appetite founded on genuine necessity, or is it merely an escape? Does it serve to make you happy, or does it exist to make you forget? Forget about reality, about the struggles you face, about the weight of existence itself?





The Role of Appetite in Escapism


Appetite often functions as a distraction, a coping mechanism that shields us from hardship. The fewer dependencies one has, the greater their ability to face reality unfiltered. And perhaps, at its core, appetite is not merely about indulgence—it is a defense mechanism against deeper understanding. A veil that separates us from the stark truths of existence.


This realization is what drove me toward philosophy. Rather than succumb to the distractions that dull the mind, I chose to confront them, to examine them, to strip them down to their core. I sought to look my vulnerabilities in the eye, rather than mask them with fleeting comforts.


That is why philosophy is the only pursuit I am truly proud of. It is not an addiction, nor an appetite—it is a discipline. A way to confront the world as it is, rather than as it is conveniently presented.


Now I turn the question back to you: what are your appetites? Are they keeping you content, or are they keeping you from seeing?


The less you are bound by desire, the more you will understand the world, and the freer you will become from such tyrannies, as a result...


91 views0 comments

Related Posts

See All

Comments


Tomasio A. Rubinshtein, Philosocom's Founder & Writer

I am a philosopher. I'm also a semi-hermit who has decided to dedicate my life to writing and sharing my articles across the globe to help others with their problems and combat shallowness. More information about me can be found here.

image (18).jpg

© 2019 And Onward, Mr. Tomasio Rubinshtein  

bottom of page