On Quasi-Specific Terms -- How To Understand and Navigate the Illusion of Accuracy In Communication
Updated: Aug 7
Article Synopsis by Mr. John Igwe and Co.
"On Quasi-Specific Terms: How To Understand and Navigate the Illusion of Accuracy In Communication" is a well-written and insightful article that explores the nuances of language and communication. The structure is well-organized, with clear sections that guide the reader through the exploration of quasi-specific terms. The article provides insightful commentary on how quasi-specific terms can create an illusion of accuracy, using relatable examples such as "video game music" and "spaceships in sci-fi."
The depth of analysis is commendable, particularly in the way the article dissects specific terms and their implications. The discussion on "video game music" is particularly enlightening, revealing the diversity within what might initially seem a specific genre. Similarly, the critique of sci-fi spaceships highlights the discrepancies between fictional representations and practical realities.
The article engages the reader through its conversational tone and the inclusion of thought-provoking questions. The writing is accessible, avoiding overly technical language while still conveying complex ideas.
In conclusion, "On Quasi-Specific Terms: How To Understand and Navigate the Illusion of Accuracy In Communication" is a valuable contribution to the discussion on effective communication and the pitfalls of vague language.
The Perils of Vague Language
Quasi: a combining form meaning “resembling,” “having some, but not all of the features of,” -- Dictionary.com
After some thought on language, I've realized that there are certain terms in any language that create the illusion of specificity. These terms may sound impressive, but upon closer inspection, they offer very little concrete meaning. Let's delve deeper into this phenomenon and explore how it can be misused, unintentionally or otherwise:
The Power of Obscurity: Big, fancy words can shroud ideas in a fog of complexity. When writers rely on overly general or ambiguous terms, it can be a way to mask a lack of clarity or in-depth knowledge about the topic at hand. This redundancy can often be found in the words of pseudo-intellectuals.
Unpacking the Jargon: Jargon-filled sentences may sound sophisticated, but if the jargon isn't clearly defined or explained, it leaves the reader lost. Effective communication relies on ensuring the intended audience understands the meaning being conveyed.
Striving for Precision: Strong writing strives for precision. Instead of relying on vague generalities, using specific examples and details paints a clearer picture for the reader.
By recognizing the pitfalls of vague language, we can become more mindful writers and discerning readers.
First Case Example: What is "Video Game Music"?
The term "video game music" might seem like a straightforward, specific genre. However, it's more like a diverse musical library. It encompasses a vast range of styles, from the chiptunes of classic 8-bit games to full-blown orchestral scores accompanying modern titles by orchestras-for-hire. Vocals or no vocals, the defining characteristic isn't the music itself, but its context: Any music that accompanies a video game.
Take Tetris, for instance. Its iconic theme music isn't an original composition, but a traditional Russian folk song called "Korobeiniki." And it was originally a poem by Nikolay Nekrasov in 1861. Only in 1989, the old folklore tune got turned into a video game classic music by Hirokazu Tanaka.
This showcases how video games can borrow and adapt existing music, making any music whatsoever a potential candidate to take part in something people regard as "a specific, niche genre". In reality, however, their misconception stems from quasi-specific terminology.
Thus, quasi-specific terms delude us, intentionally or not, by ignoring that anything can be used for game music. Another such example is a game called Crash Twinsanity. Its music was composed entirely by an a cappella group.
Intermission: Exploring Beyond Impressions
Further exploring quasi-specificity can also be a springboard for demonstrating deeper knowledge.
Here's why: someone unfamiliar with the concept might imagine video game music as a unique, esoteric genre reserved for hardcore gamers. They might not realize the incredible variety it encompasses, from reimagined folk songs to infantile acapella music.
Delving into specific examples and highlighting the surprising origins of some iconic themes, allows us to can showcase a more informed understanding of video game music's depth and intrigue.
And the same applies to many, many other fields of human knowledge. Applying reason to several departments is how you can deepen your thinking and your theory of unity.
Case Example Two: Spaceships in Sci-Fi
Science fiction has taken the concept of spaceships to new heights, depicting them in all sorts of shapes and sizes. These fictional spaceships often push the boundaries of technology and design, inspiring real-world advancements.
Here are some captivating examples:
The Millennium Falcon (Star Wars): A heavily modified Corellian freighter known for its speed and unique design. Inspired by a random half-eaten hamburger.
Starship Enterprise (Star Trek): An iconic Federation starship known for its saucer section, nacelles, and exploration of the galaxy. Horrible design flaws are its oversized engines and how clearly they are seperated from the main hull. Destroy them and you have a sitting duck without any landing gear.
Eagle 5 (Space Balls): Satirically demonstrates how science fiction can play with the concept of spaceships.... A 1986 Winnebago RV with wings.
Bottom Line of Case Example 2
While science fiction depicts them in a variety of imaginative ways, real spaceships are complex machines that do not have the many irrational flaws of many sci-fi spaceships, such as the TIE fighter, which cannot really be applicable to real life. Weak ion engines and no actual wings? Should this be considered a flying object?
Can you call this vehicle "a spacecraft" when it is too weak to even take off, and is not designed to land without special support? Can its design be applicable to real life? The squares are merely solar panels, too... Here is my AI remodel attempt:
What then, is a spaceship, if not that which possess the very elementary traits which make it one? A spaceship is not, by terminology, a TIE fighter. TIE fighters are simply a very poor application of these elementary traits, found in many other fiction and non-fiction spacecraft.
Therefore, the impracticality of many sci-fi properties in fiction, can hinder our real-life understanding of what constitutes a real-life, effective counterpart. To be greatly biased by fiction, is how fiction can distort our understanding of the real world, hindering effective communication.
Don't use Aladdin to properly talk about the Abbasid Caliphate, please.
Conclusions
The Fog of Quasi-Specificity
The quest for knowledge often leads us down paths paved with words. However, the words themselves we use can create confusion easily. This is the problem with quasi-specific terms: These terms are perceived as precise language, conveying an air of expertise, yet they ultimately leave us grasping at shadows. By the choice of the listener's perception.
Conversely, authors and speakers often intentionally deploy quasi-specific terms to establish authority, although a fallacy. By using vocabulary that seems specialized, they trick us into believing their knowledge is deeper than it might be, by our own different biases. This creates a false sense of confidence, both in the speaker and the listener.
Imagine someone describing video game music as simply "electronic bits and synthesizers." While technically accurate, it lacks depth. Much depth.
2. The Illusion of Niche Knowledge
Our own desire for knowledge fuels this illusion. We consume content with the intention of becoming more informed. When someone uses jargon-like terms, without effectively explaining what they meant, we might mistakenly interpret it as a gateway to "niche knowledge" – a hidden realm of expertise accessible only to the well-versed. Likewise, terms like "Quasi" sound sophisticated. But "Quasi" is literally synonymous to "almost".
This can be particularly true in broad fields like philosophy, with its various sub-disciplines, or science, containing countless specializations. Simply stating that someone "likes philosophy" or is a "scientist" tells us, therefore, very little. We might think it's specific. No. It's quasi-specific.
This isn't always intentional. Perhaps the speaker genuinely believes their terminology is precise. However, the consequence remains the same: We may be left with a superficial grasp of the subject at hand.
3. Path to Clarity
To navigate this linguistic labyrinth, we must cultivate a critical eye, to not, so to speak, confuse humans with jennets.
Hence, when encountering a term that sounds impressive but lacks clear meaning, we should question its purpose... Does it genuinely illuminate the topic, or is it merely a smokescreen?
Demanding specifics, instead of accepting quasi-specifics, is essential. True knowledge thrives not on vague terminology, but on terminology that is well understood, to the point of it being taken for granted by all parties involved in a discourse.
By looking beyond quasi-specificity, we can bridge the gap between language and understanding. Only then can we truly embark on the path towards realization, paved by clarity and genuine, productive study.
.jpg)
Comments