The Search Bar

This concept of the "external interpretator" can often fall prey to the authority fallac y. Humility in the Pursuit of Knowledge:  After devising and teaching myself the Drug Lord Fallacy , I am

We should also forget the notion of FOMO, or the "fear of missing out," as that idea contains the fallacy

Shogunate" I was a philosophy undergraduate at a university during high school, trying to get my first degree We always spoke in different degrees of understanding, with mine being on the Macro and long term scale Degrees, academic prestige, the titles of "Doctor" and "Professor," even my declining ability to read

evil , from their "flying monkeys", and from those who justify such acts due to "the way things are" fallacy

tort est l’une des choses les plus importantes qu’un philosophe puisse expérimenter, quel que soit son degré Because our identities, to some degree, are built on our understanding of ourselves. One that is least to resort to unnecessary biases and fallacies.

Since norms are not of the same degree of importance as rules, there's little that prevents people from In a sense, we're all laying low, at varying degrees, because of the threat of foreign attention.

have yet to hear of a job whose entire purpose is to make people praise or at least respect you to a degree You may be rich, academically educated, and so forth, but neither wealth nor degree can earn you the

Getting an academic degree is the most respected way to become a philosopher; however, some philosophers People often underestimate the natural talent to philosophize and believe a degree is needed to be an I do not have any degrees and yet I am good at philosophizing. Some of you thought I am a doctor, that I have a degree, that I am an academic lecturer. Negative. Those who are unable to read books or don't get a degree like me shouldn't be excluded by the academic

Should our imagination exist at the same degree of "existence" as the world beyond the mind, and it can In reality, however, each and every one of us may be delusional to a degree, as a result.

Degrees to "back up" your intellect. While wealth, academic degrees and other conquests can be satisfying for many, it's not a universal

, forcing us to confront our own mortality and the ultimate futility of our endeavors (the Eternity Fallacy

People who care more about things related to the ad-hominem fallacy, even though it should be clear to the rational man and woman why it's a fallacy in the first place. It's a fallacy because in philosophical discourse, the ideas exchanged matter far more than the people In fact, it is often a logical fallacy. That is because emotional experiences are more memorable. However, that is a fallacy by itself.

"Yes, you must be successful, obey authorities , go to school, college, get degrees, have a high-paying I personally chose to stop getting my philosophy degree, despite enjoying the coursework and having the

delude ourselves using our feelings towards this value, by unintentionally committing the parasocial fallacy Could I be making the strawman's fallacy by asking these questions?

It appears that there is a certain degree of normalcy that can make one unique enough than many "textbook

Partake in peaceful exchanges of ideas to learn about new things without spending much money on degrees

Experiences once accepted at face value are now invaded by a questioning, inspecting it from every degree of context, can appear smaller, less significant compared to the vast canvas of existence, and the degrees

Which means that any human is capable to be useful to a degree . That includes yourselves as well.

Regardless of income, every job can be considered important to some degree.

But this is a gross expression of the strawman's fallacy , that prioritizes stereotypical impressions

Once we have established a greater degree of survivability, we can then focus on fulfilling our potential

However, why must a machine have a specific degree of complexity, in order to be or not considered as A machine, like a car, consist of different parts, that correlate with each other to allow a degree

Yet, each of one of us possesses them, and each one of us at least in some kind of degree ought to limit Why would communication serve a wholly social purpose if it, at some degree, proves dysfunctional to the degree of the normative and approved frames and patterns of communication?

Nevertheless, it's safe to say we all possess a degree of ego, whether we choose to display it or not Any relationship based on any type of goodwill must include some degree of vulnerability.

Skarr Allegory (Or, On Hiding From Honesty) Why The Truth Isn't Always Interesting -- The Bored Man's Fallacy